Should We Be Scared of the UK Strain?

If you Google “COVID-19 News”, many of the results reference the new “UK strain” of the virus. What is this strain? Should we be worried? And what do new strains mean for the fight against COVID-19?


Note: This article was written in late December when we knew very little about the emerging SARS-CoV-2 strains. Since the time of writing this article, new data has emerged characterizing the UK (B.1.1.7) strain as well as the Brazil (P.1) and South Africa (B.1.351) strains. The consensus on the threat that these strains may impose has shifted from “it will likely be fine” to “this is very worrying”.

I am leaving this blog post up as a record of how information changes with time during a pandemic. Before you take the post below at face value, please read my updated post.


What is a “strain” of a disease?

The word “strain” does not have a technical definition; it’s a loose term used by scientists to describe when there are significant differences between multiple lineages of a pathogen. Pathogens are constantly evolving and mutating. When those mutations amount to a significant change in the way the pathogen behaves, we call it a new strain.

In this case, officials are calling the UK variant (dubbed SARS-CoV-2-B.1.1.7) a new strain due to its apparent ability to be transmitted easier than previous strains of COVID. Many outlets are reporting a 70% increase in transmissibility, but that number is still being assessed and validated by virologists and epidemiologists. There also seem to be a number of mutations in a very important protein on the surface of the virus: the spike protein. SARS-CoV-2 uses its spike protein to bind to cell surfaces, allowing it to enter a cell and start replication. These mutations in the UK variant likely make it easier for the virus to enter our cells, which is the reason why we are seeing such an increase in transmission.

It should be noted that there are a number of other strains emerging across the globe. Notably, there are strains emerging in South Africa and Nigeria. Luckily, like the UK variant, these other strains appear to be no more deadly than the original SARS-CoV-2 strain.


Is the emergence of a new strain surprising? Not at all.

Before infecting humans, SARS-CoV-2 likely infected bats and, accordingly, was adapted for transmission between bats.  Given its sustained transmission among human populations, it’s not surprising that the virus would similarly begin to adapt to the human body and become more transmissible.

In fact, this is probably what happened during the 1918 Flu Pandemic. The influenza virus that started the 1918 pandemic was likely an animal virus that entered the human population. We don’t have the same level of genomic data for the 1918 influenza virus as we do for SARS-CoV-2, but generally as a pathogen adapts to a human host, it develops mutations that enable it to spread more freely from person to person.

Even after a pathogen has adapted to humans, it’s not uncommon for it to continue evolving into new strains. For example, influenza has circulated throughout the human population for a long time, which has led to many different strains emerging. This is one of the reasons we need to get a seasonal flu shot.

For animal species, evolution takes place over hundreds of thousands or even millions of years. For bacteria and viruses, however, evolution is much more rapid, sometimes taking as little time as a few days. This will not be the last time we see new strains of SARS-CoV-2 emerge.


Is this all worrying? Potentially.

Am I more worried than before? Not really.

I am not worried because by all accounts, it seems that the current vaccines for COVID-19 will work against these new strains. What would be much more worrying is the emergence of a new viral serotype

A serotype is a variant of a pathogen that “looks” different to our immune system compared to previous strains. Think of it like a criminal wearing a fake moustache to sneak past people who have seen their face in a wanted poster. 

The emerging UK variant is, by contrast, very likely not wearing a fake moustache. If your body has had some exposure to the virus, either by infection or by vaccine, you will likely remain safe to subsequent infection of the B.1.1.7 strain.


Does the emergence of a new strain change how we’re fighting the virus?

We already have the tools to effectively reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2. We know that masks are incredibly effective, and we know that indoor dining greatly increases the chance of transmission. Lockdowns can be effective if done correctly but they are brutally disruptive on economies and public support for that type of intervention is low. Hopefully, the emergence of new strains will renew politicians’ concerns about the virus, but, overall, I don’t see it necessarily changing our strategies.

Scientists and epidemiologists are still working to find if there is something we should be worried about. Until we know more details about the emerging strains, keep doing what we’ve been doing – just with renewed determination.

Viruses will mutate as they spread; this is an inevitable fact. If you can help to stop the spread in some way, you are also helping to keep new strains from emerging. With the vaccines rolling out, we are closer than ever before to the end of this pandemic. Stay strong!

Have any questions about COVID-19? Diseases in general? Let me know in the comments below!


10 responses to “Should We Be Scared of the UK Strain?”

  1. Very informative! Thanks for explaining definitions so us lay people can understand better!!😉

    Like

  2. I found your post very interesting. I was happy to hear that the new strains will be taken care of by vaccines. You may be right about indoor spreading and lockdowns. However I don’t believe any science has documented that. The extreme radical inconsistent log downs have been motivated by individuals to show power. I do believe that we have to be very careful. I just fear for the children that are not getting food, teaching in school, peer interaction. Also trained people that can notice stress, abuse and extra help that is needed. And be there for them.
    It gives me hope from your information that there is a light ahead for us. Between prayer and true science our future will be strong. Thank you for your information.

    Like

    1. There is actually significant evidence pointing to the effectiveness of lockdowns. There was a great article published by Reuters in November that fact checks the effectiveness of lockdowns. I think it’s important to note, lockdowns are most effective when they’re targeted to specific regions and supplemented with economic and social relief by the government and community. The effects that lockdowns have on mental health and wellbeing are often not talked about by public health officials which is very frustrating, I definitely agree with you there.

      Link to the Reuters article: https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-lockdowns/fact-check-studies-show-covid-19-lockdowns-have-saved-lives-idUSKBN2842WS

      I also agree with you about the importance of schools. I am hoping and advocating for school teachers and other school administrators to be considered high priority for the vaccine. Hopefully we are able to make school a safe place for children and teachers alike in the next few months.

      Like

  3. Thank you so much for taking the time to clarify some major buzzwords that the media loves for scare tactics in this very well-written article!

    I have one question regarding the long-term effects of the virus, especially on young adults who are seeing an early onset of chronic cardiovascular and pulmonary issues.

    Is it the symptoms of COVID-19 that are causing the blood clots, strokes, damage to alveoli, and chronic fatigue in this small population of young people who have been infected with the virus, or could they already have underlying health issues that the virus is expediting? If so, does this new strain that has mutated to affect humans more easily mean that we will see higher rates of these ongoing COVID-19 related health issues far into the future?

    (Referencing this article: https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/coronavirus-long-term-effects/art-20490351#:~:text=COVID%2D19%20symptoms%20can%20sometimes,completely%20within%20a%20few%20weeks.)

    Like

    1. Hi Spencer! I imagine it could be a bit of both. As my understanding stands now (and I’m not an immunologist, so take my opinion with a grain of salt), any clots that are formed could be due to inflammation at the site of infection. It is hard to speak definitively to the emerging strains because, honestly, we don’t have enough data to fully predict what these new strains will do to the body. We are still trying to figure out the physiological effects of the original strain of SARS-CoV-2, let alone new strains that might be changing that physiology.

      As I read more on the effects these new strains have on our bodies, I will try to update here!

      Like

  4. Nice digest of complicated information. I might believe there is reason for concern if the variant is more infectious (as it appears to be), even if its mortality rate is similar to the predecessor strain. Greater transmissibility means more exposures, so greater volume of mortal outcomes (even if there is no change proportionally). I believe this is true even after we have critical mass of vaccination, but is especially true before we can get the vaccine out there. Great blog.

    Like

    1. Hey Mike, thanks for reading it over. I agree with you, about hospitals. When I originally wrote the blog post, I tried to reflect the sentiment of the public health officials that I was talking to. Now, there are a few strains that are emerging that seem to be concerning (Brazil seems to have a potential vaccine escape variant). In light of new information and the changing sentiment, I am writing an update that I should post here in the next few days.

      Thanks again!

      Like

  5. Thank you for writing this. I appreciate the work you do and the attempt to spread clear and honest information. You and your research are vital to us and our future, maybe the next Dr. Fauci!
    I have my ear out about the new UK strain for sure. Interesting how it seems to be more contagious but not more virulent. Any updates on the other new strain… the one in South Africa and Brazil?
    Thanks for any info.

    Like

    1. Yes! Since writing this, more information has come out regarding the emerging strains. I am especially keeping my eye on the strain emerging in Brazil. This strain has a mutation in its Spike protein denoted “E484K” which seems to have some potential for reinfecting individuals who have already cleared the virus previously. This week, I plan to write an update about both that strain and the changing sentiment shared by public health officials regarding the other emerging strains.

      Like

  6. […] one thing I did not note in the original post (note: left in its original form) is that there are concerns that the higher rate of infection of […]

    Like

Leave a reply to A Small Update on Emerging SARS-CoV-2 Strains – The Nature of Health is Change – Diseases and Data Cancel reply